.  .  I never thought of myself much as a "normal" person - but God has kept me safe once before, through a trying time - growing up as (what Mark Levin calls) a liberal drone (more wannabe "60s flower child) in 1960s-1970s California. California then was not what it has become; but this too was a lesson for now, when it counts.
. . . After a few incidents I have experienced personally, after the Charleston Nine and its aftermath, now with New Orleans (and all the live feeds)... through it all, the misguided who spew on social media, and the near constant hovering of the haters... It wasn't until last weekend's "attention" from this Brad Griffin/Hunter Wallace character that I made certain connections. (I've now spent some time looking in some of the "usual suspect" areas, which confirms some of the promptings I have felt this week.) And I have something to say.
. . . Mr. Griffin seemed quite interested in convincing me that I was a "Rainbow Confederate." I had not heard the term before save in one context - of an alleged homosexual person who claimed to be following that interest as well as honoring his Confederate heritage (debatable as to whether such is possible). It appears that whatever my prior introduction to this term was about, the current "narrative" is that "rainbow Confederates" are those of us who believe that the CSA was a wonderland of racial integration, of "modern racial attitudes" revising the actual history of secessionist areas during the 1860s. The persons promulgating such a "narrative" appear to run the gamut - from far Left groups who habitually divide and define everything along racial lines, and have decreed that anyone and anything Confederate was (and are) racist -- to far alt-right groups - Klan, LOSers, neo-Nazis and the like who - whatever else they believe - also habitually divide and define everything along racial lines. (I tend to use the shorthand "haters on the right AND the left in my own head, though I rarely use it in public - since no one that believes in race group divisions along political and social lines is conservative).
. . . What concerned me most about Mr. Griffin was his youth - and his family ties. We know that hate is taught. But in Mr. Griffin's desire to keep introducing examples of the worst racist literature as "exhibits" to prove his points (such as they were), I was reminded of the pedophile that introduces his targets to porn in order to sexualize and corrupt; to deaden innocence and health. I am not saying that racism is a form of sexual perversion. What I am saying is that it is LIKE sexual perversion - a sin that is of the flesh, that combines sinful pride and gluttony and idolatry,
. . . Beauregard was correct when he wrote that race troubles were largely imaginary. Now, to some people, such a statement might seem delusional. Beauregard was writing in 1873, at the height of Reconstruction in Louisiana; and today people make livings off of exploiting what the PC-culture calls racial issues. A man became the 44th President due to the race factor. I say again - Beauregard was right; this idea of racial categories since 1865 is one of the worst deceptions of the devil.
. . . But do not tell the race haters - the RODs - that. The Leftists who promote multiculturalism need the Caucasian of Confederate ancestry for a continued enemy. This is an imagined construction of our fathers, a useful (to RODs) strawman which justifies both the racist hater and the Marxist (pretend) anti-hater, who both divide. There were legal reasons for racial descriptions in slavery days; but it was Reconstruction and carpetbag pitting of the races one against the other that turned the APPLIED descriptions to evil. And then eugenics was introduced, to a world still desperate to understand God's Purpose for the war, and the loss of so many brave men. It was a time when science would produce miracles; only this time, racial and Darwinian evolutionary "science" was godless, and the lessons of Frankenstein's monster were to be taught.
. . . There shall always be those fools - and there were such back in the 19th Century - who have one skin color and believe that is some great virtue (even though it is something they had no agency in). They make skin color into a fetish. The Marxist needs Americans to feel guilt about our history and our military men. The wannabe tyrant needs people to be conflicted about even the possibility of free Americans who know to defend their rights, sure defenders as our Confederate ancestors were. We are not allowed heroes, virtue and honor by the haters of either "side." All such are mutually-supportive agitators - the haters of American virtue depend upon the racial dividers. All hate this country and their neighbors - the malcontents and miscreants who are disturbers of the peace of this world...
. . . People of character and substance neither care nor think about their skin color or arbitrary racial category. They certainly do not compound lies on top of lies, and violate God's laws about false witness and idolatry by creating division amongst people and reducing the individual to the definition provided by skin color.
. . . So when some young man of a third of my experience of life tries to tell me about the men of the Confederacy, all I can do is feel sorry for him - that he has been corrupted by liars with a tool - this race obsession - and like pornography, it has wrapped its tentacles around his sad heart. Whether it's Marx, or race hatred, or molestation, it's all corruption. I can actually feel fortunate; when the pedophile network was destroying my community youth activity, at least my music was something genuine I was losing - that America at large was losing. Whether it is liberalism, sexual identity politics or racial theories, all of those things ought to be lost as quickly as possible as built upon sand - that blinds one; and once lost, one has a chance to build that which is built upon a rock.
. . . Ever since I was a child and first heard of them, I thought that any white supremacist that was truly interested in the "superiority" of the race would never waste any of their time on worrying about other races - they would be too busy policing their own as well as developing further their fellows in their great culture, under God. Such RODs cannot have a clue as to the great Confederates whom we honor. Such Marxist manipulators of language cannot understand the words of our ancestors who lived and worked alongside their neighbors for God and their community. No, I would never compare my Confederate ancestors with having "modern" ideas. They were better than that - which is why they must not be dishonored by RODs.
. . . Thus, whether Marxist, Pan-African, Supremacist (of whatever color) or gender role revisionist, such people are degenerates who are tools in the attacks on America and the Confederacy - the finest cultures outside of Israel - under God, that we have had on this planet. It's the RODs who, with their fetish and generational seduction of the vulnerable with the sin of their race divisions, are tools in rotting America from within.